Die korrupten Moldawischen Regierungen mit Rompetrol, Offshore Firmen und dem Ex-Premier Minister Ion Sturza

Moldova: The Offshore Connection Of An Ex-PM 

Reporters from RISE Moldova found some Moldovan names in the Panama Papers, including former Prime Minister Ion Sturza and businessman Constantin Lutsenko. Sturza insists that the offshore organizations to which he is linked did not benefit him financially and said he has done nothing wrong.

Sturza and the Rompetrol Group

When former Moldovan Prime Minister Ion Sturza first heard about the Panama Papers, he posted a warning on his Facebook page to his former colleagues:

“I see some of the Moldovan politicians [are] very relaxed in Dubai’s offshores” thinking that the offshore scandal is only about Panama, he wrote. But in reality, he said, the Panama Papers are “a gigantic investigation by an international journalist consortium,” including RISE Moldova, who will continue to search through the documents looking for names.

“Are you still mocking RISE?” he asked, implying this is the quiet before the storm. “Enjoy it, Moldovan politicians, owners of hidden offshores!”

One hour later, RISE reporters did find some Moldovan names: that of Sturza himself and businessman Constantin Lutsenko, in records linked to offshores connected to the late Romanian billionaire, Dinu Patriciu.

The Panama Papers are records compiled by Mossack Fonseca, a Panamanian legal firm doing business in offshore tax havens for clients who want to hide their identities and/or holdings.

The data was obtained by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists with the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and more than 110 media partners from 82 countries, including OCCRP partner RISE Moldova.

Sturza insists that the offshore organizations to which he is linked did not benefit him financially and said he has done nothing wrong.

How did his name get on those documents?

Two years after Sturza withdrew from politics in 2000, he went into business with Patriciu, the former head of the Rompetrol Group, a multinational oil company with most of its assets located in Romania, France, Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova.

Sturza worked at Rompetrol from 2002 to 2009, along with Lutsenko. According to the Panama Papers, the two men were also partners in hidden offshore companies during that period.

Reporters for RISE Moldova asked Sturza about the companies–Markside Holdings Ltd. and Chandler Group Holdings–which were registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), a notorious tax haven.

Sturza insists he received no benefit from his association with them. “I have never been a beneficiary of such a company,” he told RISE.

“Perhaps Rompetrol used those companies in one formula or another, but I have no reference about them. In the Rompetrol group, there were very many companies where we, as managers, were beneficiaries, but I don’t recall anything about those companies. But they weren’t companies for evasions or for financial or other types of coverage.”

He later amended his response slightly, after talking to the lawyers who set up the companies, and said, “Those companies were set up for maritime operations and unfortunately were never used, because the business failed.”

What emerges in the Panama Papers is that, at least on paper, the business interests of Sturza and Lutsenko were closely entwined for several years.

In 2005, Sturza was serving as Rompetrol’s deputy president for development in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a group of former Soviet countries, when the Rompetrol Group opened a representative office in Moscow and named Lutsenko its director. Lutsenko had previously worked for a series of important Russian companies, including Gazprom and Novochimtrans, as well as American and German petrochemical companies.


Page 1 of  6


Sturza participated in the negotiations and subsequent sale of the Rompetrol Group to the state-owned company KazMunaiGaz (KMG) in Kazakhstan. The purchase gave the Kazakhs two Romanian refineries: Petromidia on the Black Sea and Vega in Ploiești, a city north of Bucharest, as well as a maritime oil terminal.

The transaction made Patriciu a billionaire and the richest Romanian at the time. Patriciu died of cancer in 2014, at the age of 64.

In 2009, when the Kazakh takeover of Rompetrol was complete, Sturza left his job as deputy president and his position on the board of the Rompetrol Group to become president of an investment fund, Fribourg Capital, a Luxembourg-based company through which he launched a number of businesses in Romania and Moldova.

Moldovan-Romanian-Russian Offshore Businesses

Sturza and Lutsenko did more than just work for Patriciu during their time at Rompetrol. A few months after the Rompetrol office in Moscow was created, in August 2005, the three became business partners in Markside Holdings Ltd., an offshore company registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI).

After seven years of operation, Markside Holdings was dissolved. The decision was made at a 2012 shareholders meetings, where Sturza was elected secretary and signed the liquidation decision.

Chandler Group Holdings

According to documents obtained by RISE Moldova, Sturza was also Lutsenko’s associate in another company registered in the BVI in May of 2008, Chandler Group Holdings. That company’s founders include Gunnar Nordsletten, whose father served as Norwegian ambassador to Russia between 2000 and 2008.

Seven months after Chandler Group was established, Sturza withdrew as a shareholder, transferring his 9 percent of the company to Lutsenko, who held about three-quarters of the shares. In 2014, all of the company’s shares were transferred to three additional offshores: Thinkpulse SA, Argali Holdings Ltd., and Sovereign Sales & Commerce Ltd.


Lutsenko, Uzbekov and Shchukin

The three offshore companies also appear among the shareholders of another offshore company registered in Luxemburg, Einer Energy Holding. More details about Einer Energy can be gleaned from court filings in a 2014 legal dispute in Canada.

The Canadian case involves Lutsenko, whose assets were frozen by the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto at the request of a Cayman Island-based company, East Guardian SPC.



Related stories

Mali’s Friend Founds Offshores in Emirates

Serbian businessman Vladimir Delić, who was involved in the 2004 privatization of a railroad parts company along with Belgrade Mayor Siniša Mali and his father, has opened an offshore company in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

US Politiker, EU Mafia, Pentagon, SPW-Berlin die modernen Taliban: How America backed the ISIS Takeover and Destruction of Palmyra

Einmalig die Verbrechen überall, von der KAS angefangen, korrupten Gestalten im Auswärtigen Amte, KfW, Elmar Brok, Martin Schulz immer dabei, Volker Perthes, die Deutschen Aussenminister Mafia beim Massenmorden, Lügen, Ethnische Säuberungen: vom Balkan, Kosovo, über Afghanistan, Libyen, Syrien, bis zur Ukraine: Triebfeder: dumpe kriminelle Energie.

EU Commission

Die Taliban sind Nichts, gegen diese Leute, welche heute die unnützte NATO Terroristen Organisation befehlen.

US-Analyst Stratfor über NATO: Anachronismus ohne jeglichen Zweck

US-Think Tank: Feindliche Übernahme in Deutschland mit Hilfe gekaufter CIA Gangster, wie Volkes Perthes

Korrupter Deppen Club der EU mit dem Türkischen Hitler und IS Capo: Ahmet Davutoglu
Korrupter Deppen Club der EU mit dem Türkischen Hitler und IS Capo: Ahmet Davutoglu

Nigel Farage schockiert mit Erklärung

Schriftgrösse: Decrease font Enlarge font

Der britische Politiker hat gesagt, dass die EU eine Schandtat in der Ukraine begangen habe und das niederländische Referendum eine Wohltat für Europa sei.

Nigel Farage, Parteichef der UK Independence Party (UKIP) und Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, schockierte mit seiner Rede über das niederländische Referendum im Europäischen Parlament. Er sagte , dass diese Entscheidung „der Beginn einer neuen Politik“ war und jetzt „würden die Menschen über die antidemokratische EU triumphieren.“

Andere EU-Politiker zögerten nicht, seine scheinbar provokative Erklärung zu attackieren. So fragte der Schwede Peter Eriksson, wie er ein Referendum geniessen könne, wenn dies Putin froh machen würde.“ Der Brite hatte erklärt, dass die Europäische Union eine Schandtat in der Ukraine begangen habe und mit dem Sturz und eine korrupte Regierung förderte.

„Wir begannen tatsächlich mit einem Stock den russischen Bären zu stechen und waren dann von seiner Reaktion überrascht. Das hätten wir nicht tun müssen“,sagte Nigel Farage.


Eine ganz besondere Art den Ausgang des Referendums zu kommentieren, hat El Resitas im spanischen TV in einem Videoclip. Der Mann ist in ganz Spanien für seine speziellen Statements bekannt.

Ein herzzerreißendes Propagandabild, das Entworfen ist, um Eine große US-Militäroperation Innerhalb Syriens gegen das Syrische Militär zu Rechtfertigen.

Ein herzzerreißender Propagandabild, das entworfen ist, um eine große US-Militäroperation innerhalb Syriens gegen das syrische Militär zu rechtfertigen.



How America backed the ISIS Takeover and Destruction of Palmyra

EDITOR’S CHOICE | 17.04.2016
How America backed the ISIS Takeover and Destruction of Palmyra

As explosions from detonated mines continued in the background a Syrian general confirmed in some detail an ugly truth: Washington and its close allies Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel backed the ISIS takeover and destruction of Palmyra.

Most of the weapons ISIS used were from the US , with some ammunition from Israel . ISIS had US Hummers, spinning explosive projectiles and military rations from the US , Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

That should not have been a surprise. US officials admitted in 2014 that their allies Turkey , the Saudis and Qatar were backing every single armed group in Syria , in an attempt to overthrow the Syrian Government led by President Bashar al Assad.

Our group of 30 journalists visited liberated Palmyra on 14 April, 18 days after the Syrian Army freed the historic city from a ten month reign of terror. Syrian bulldozers were cleaning debris while Russian sappers continued exploding mines. Three thousand had been cleared and another 30 exploded in the two hours we were there.

We saw the damaged buildings, bomb and mine craters along the roads, and the bizarre steel and wire structure where ‘infidels’ and pro-government people were publicly crucified and beheaded, their bodies drained of blood into what had been a pleasant fountain next to the entrance to the historic sites. We saw the extensive vandalism to the museum, with all human or animal statues beheaded or damaged.

More than 1,600 ISIS terrorists – many from Chechnya , Saudi Arabia , Tunisia and other countries, as well as some Syrians – had converged on Palmyra in May 2015, just as Jabhat al Nusra (al Qaeda in Syria ) led an invasion of NATO-backed Islamists from Turkey into Northern Syria . The ISIS groups invading Palmyra came from the east: from Raqqa, Deir eZorr and Abu Kamal, but also a group from the west.

The US, which since 2014 claimed to be conducting a war against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and which had air power and sophisticated surveillance of the region, did nothing to stop the huge ISIS advance on Palmyra.

Again, this should have been unsurprising. Eight months earlier General Martin Dempsey, head of the US military, admitted that his ‘major Arab allies’ were funding ISIS . In response, Senator Lindsay Graham, chair of the US Armed Forces Committee, defended the sponsors of ISIS , saying ‘they fund them because the Free Syrian Army couldn’t fight Assad, they were trying to beat Assad’.