Von Bosnien, Kosovo bis heute Syrien: die NATO und Deutschen Kopf Abschneider als Partner

Irgendeine Kultur müssen Deutsche ja verbreiten, wenn man überall desaströs im Betrugs und Bestechungs Sumpf mit Kriminellen und Lobbyisten gescheitert ist. Die Ukraine und das Balkan Desaster in Bosnien, Kosovo, Albanien ist nur das aktuelle Debakel, wo Milliarden für nichts verschwanden, mit einer Aussenpolitik durch korrupte Idioten.

http://i0.wp.com/justizalltag-justizskandale.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/jefferson_thumb.jpg?resize=300%2C169

Die Lügen von Angela Merkel ohne Ende auch über Syrien.

Cartoon: Merkel Afghanistan (medium) by Schwarwel tagged merkel,angela,angie,blitzbesuch,besuch,truppen,soldat,bundeswehr,afghanistan,krieg,kollateralschaden,frieden,guttenberg,karikatur,schwarwel,angela merkel,blitzbesuch,besuch,truppen,soldat,bundeswehr,afghanistan,krieg,kollateralschaden,frieden,guttenberg,angela,merkel

Ein altes Haupt Problem das man Informationen abschöpft, ist bis heute weder im Auswärtigen Amte, noch bei Militär gelöst worden. Also kann man den Saft Laden der Korruptions das Auswärtige Amte schliessen. Bedeutung haben die Deutschen im Ausland sowieso mit diesen Murks Gestalten nicht mehr.

Steinmeier

Wenn man denken anfängt und nicht dazu in der Lage ist: Deutsche Aussenpolitik, als Bestechungs Motor, der Privatisierung und des Betruges und nicht mehr im Ausland. Witz Figur der Terroristen Finanzierung und arachischer Banditen Clans, u.a. dem Barzani Clan im Nord Irak. Frank Walter Steinmeier.

10 Jahre Null Deutsche Aussenpolitik im Balkan und in der Welt

Aktuell in Kiew ebenso: aus Balkanblog

Steinmeier mit Killern und Verbrechern unterwegs, siehe Bosnien, Kosovo wobei Kopf Abschneider die bevorzugten Partner sind, neben Mördern, Drogen Bossen und Frauen Händlern.

Kiew maidan

Die EU war beleidigt, wie kleine Kinder, als der EU Vertrag nicht unterzeichnet wurde, was auf das Klein Kinder Niveau zuschliessen ist.

 Wie in Bosnien, Kosovo: die US – Britischen Terroristen als Partner, köpfen Christen und nun den Katholischen Bischof: François Murad in Syrien

Saudi in Bosnien
arabischer Freiwilliger Saudischer Freiwilliger der „7. Bosnian Muslim Brigade“ stationiert in Zenica mit dem Kopf eines Serben.
Die Ironie der Geschichte ist, dass hier offensichtlich unter US-amerikanischer Schirmherrschaft und mit saudischem Geld Personal trainiert und Kriegspraktiken eingeübt wurden, die heute – wieder einmal – auf die Amerikaner selbst zurückschlagen.

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4683/tgri5.jpg

thaci

Kosovo Partner der Deutschen! Viele Kopf Abschneider haben Deutschen Pass zuvor erhalten.

Das US Desaster mit den Kosovo Terroristen, die in Syrien auf Raubzug gingen

Deutscher Takfirist aus Berlin “Deso Dogg” in bester Kopfabschneider- Gesellschaft, die westliche Wertegemeinschaft in #Syrien

25/03/2014

18+

Nachdem es Gerüchte gab dass Denis Cuspert, alias Deso Dogg erneut ins Grass gebissen haben soll, beeilen sich seine Freunde das Gerücht zu dementieren.

Demnach erfreut sich der deutsche Aufständische, Aktivist, Rebell, syrische Oppositionelle oder wie unsere Medienvertreter die Halsabschneider in Syrien bezeichnen, bester Gesundheit, in hervorragender  Gesellschaft mit Abu Abd al-Rahman Al-Iraqi  und vertritt weiterhin die deutschen demokratischen Werte in Syrien.

Ein FB-Foto mit entsprechendem Text besagt: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1431436543767221&set=a.1390999101144299.1073741826.100007026661009&type=1
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007026661009″>صادق الغالي

“>صورة تجمع بين أبو عبد الرحمن العراقي وأبو طلحة الألماني الذي اشيع انه استشهد الدولة_الإسلامية_في_العراق_والشام‬

Image combining Abu Abd al-Rahman Al-Iraqi and Abu Talha the German, rumored that cite #الدولة_الإسلامية_في_العراق_والشام
Dazu gibt es noch ein hübsches Foto bei dem Iraker per  “sozialem” Netzwerk- Twitter:

https://twitter.com/abudurahman50/status/448178048597504001/photo/1

Deso Dogg mit einem freundlichen Iraker welcher auch kleine Lämmchen und Kinder lieb hat wenn man seine Medien und Vernetzungen  bei Twitter betrachtet.

 Umfangreiche Video und Foto Sammlung der Kopf Abschneider Banden der NATO in Syrien und der türkischen Verbrecher Banden in Syrien

Abu Talha the German mit  Abu Abd al-Rahman Al-Iraqi:

Deso Dogg

deso dogg mit Kumpel

https://twitter.com/abudurahman50/status/448178048597504001/photo/1/large

Bjg_j31IMAAxXWk.jpg large

 

Da unsere Medien sowenig über die Kopfabschneider in Syrien schreiben, auch nicht über die deutschen Vertreter unserer inzwischen zutiefst verkommen Wertegemeinschaft, vielgelobt bei unseren öffentlich-rechtlichen Sendern als Aufständische und Rebellen, welche Syrien nur von einem bösen Diktator befreien wollen, so zeige ich was unsere deutsche Wertegemeinschaft, vertreten auch bei den Freunden Syriens, so drauf hat.

Die  syrisch-deutsch-irakische Freundschaft und ihre Werte:

https://twitter.com/abudurahman50/status/444905356582735872/photo/1

Und es ist mir so ziemlich egal ob die YPG, SAA, oder FSA die Köpfe abschneiden. Es sind schwerstkriminelle Barbaren aus dem frühen Mittelalter und auch aus dem heutigen so weltoffenen Berlin!

Deutschirakische Freundschaft

Sie hängen YPG-Kämpfer an Zäune, andere zeigten sie auch schon in Azzaz geköpft, am Rande von wenigen Medien erwähnt.

 

BjhMqoOIgAAQfxe

Und was der Glaubensgenosse von dem Berliner Deso Dogg sonst noch für richtig hält twittert er weiter:

https://twitter.com/abudurahman50/media

Einige Beispiele:

Syrien:

BiyfEH-IgAA1FFg

+

+

 

Der Kopf soll von einem YPG-Kämpfer stammen, geköpft und ausgestellt in Azzaz, am Rande von Medien erwähnt, von den zwangsbezahlten ÖRF-Umsturz-Medien jedoch verschweigen.

 

Abu Iraker Abu Deutscher

Am Rande ist den Medien die deutsche Beteiligung aufgefallen, aber die Journallie hat nach einem Alibi-Artikel das Maul gehalzten anstatt konsequent die Verbrechen zu zeigen und die verschwiegenen aufzurollen.

BgcEdl0IgAAvKtU

 

Die ideologisch Gleichgesinnten im Irak, welche der Deutsche Baghdadi-Jihadist so mag…: ( wer es aushält, hier mehr https://twitter.com/diyala1435/media )

BjdssO_CQAEFuaY

 

Syrien:

 

BjgODlbIAAAAtN7

Die Fotos zu Dokumentationszwecken über die horrenden Verbrechen in Syrien, auch durch Deutsche ausgeführt. Vom “Gangster-Rapper” oder “Pizzafahrer” zum Halsabschneider, hauptsache die Ideologie stimmt.

Deso Dogg leibhaftig...

Deso Dogg leibhaftig…

Da hat Deso Dogg aber einen feinen Kumpel welcher auch seine älteren Anscheulichkeiten zeigt: Aleppo, Zafira?

https://twitter.com/abudurahman50/status/444599124164640768/photo/1

Rahman mit Kopf

Rahman mit Kopf

Weitere neue Fotos  über Köpfe, sie werden als PKK bezeichnet, ich vermute es handelt sich um Kurden von der YPG,  welche die Deso-Dogg-Merkel-Steinmeier-Jihadisten bekämpfen:

https://twitter.com/AlBttar88/status/448101356360843264/photo/1

Bjf5zzmCQAAyOFT.jpg large

Die  HRW-”Raqqa”Nachwuchskopfabschneider stolz, durften sie den Kopf abschneiden und präsentiern:  https://twitter.com/AlBttar88/status/448101459972730880/photo/1/large Nomen est omen “AlBttar88/”, die Zahl 88 auch gerne in Deutschland genutzt….

Was tut man den Kindern an, unterstützt durch die UN-Beauftragten zum “Schutz” für Kinder.

Raqqa, Kinder welche nun HRW´s Menschenrechte vertreten

Raqqa, Kinder welche nun HRW´s Menschenrechte vertreten

https://twitter.com/JehadNews/status/448212783084347392/photo/1/large

Und etwas stimmt in unserer feinen demokratischen Gesellschaft nicht, so dass Menschen zu Unmenschen werden!

Und an die “Pierre V-Unterstützer”, ob aus Berlin oder anderswo, welche mir die Kommentare vollspammen über den bösen Diktator Assad, erspart euch die Mühe, ich werde unflätige und vollkommen haßerfüllte dumpfe Kommentare nicht freischalten. Und wenn euch nicht passt was eure Kumpels in Syrien zeigen, dann fordert sie dazu auf nicht mehr zu Morden und sich den Behörden zu stellen!

Es ist kein Islam welchen sie vertreten, sie vertreten faschistische Ideologien, und diese wahabitisch-saudische  Ideologie  hat mit Islam wenig zu tun. Eher mit Faschismus, geschürt durch Israel, USA, Deutschland, …,   gegen Schiiten, gegen die Hisbollah, gegen den Iran, sie ähnelt der Ideologie von Zionisten.

Jede Gesellschaft hat seine Rechtsextremen, man muß sich nur die Ukraine anschauen und unsere Politiker und Medien betrachten welche wieder ganz vorne mitmarschieren.

An unsere Medien, genau diese gezeigten Halsabschneider sind ganz begeistert über die türkische Mithilfe bei der Besetzung von Kassab, ein Ort bewohnt hauptsächlich von Armeniern. Die Geschichte wiederholt sich.

Erdogans NATO-Krieger bei Kassab, die Methoden der Jabhat al Nusrah unterscheiden sich nicht von denen der ISIS-Al-Qaedas oder der FSA-Todesschwadrone:

 

Christliche Symbole in Kassab:

KasabGottesmutter KasabKirche KasabKreuz

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=461679040628716&set=a.118282211635069.19554.100003598729905&type=1

1960049_461679040628716_1955631911_n

Turkey is providing these people with Aircover, that’s right AlQaeda getting NATO’s help http://www.syrianews.cc/turkey-shoots-syrian-jet-support-alqaeda-offensive

 

18 mal Köpfe abschneiden und ausstellen: sowas unterstützt die SWP-Berlin und Westerwelle sowieso und etliche Verbrecher aus den USA.

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtSrjxoIUAEBxy8.jpg:large#

 

http://urs1798.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/obamas-terroristen-massenmorden-in-syrien-bgm-71-tow-syria/

 

Mit dabei auch die Ahrar al Sham:

“670 Armenian families, the majority of the population of Kessab evacuated”

———-

Auch in Raqqa werden Menschen erneut ans Kreuz gehängt unter dem Schweigen unserer Medien!

Die USraelische Weltpolitik kreiert Monster welche sich gezielt benutzen lassen, wie Hitllery Rodham Clinton treffend beschrieb:

“We created Al-Qaeda”

 

GekreuzigtRaqqa

 

 

 

 

Jedes Staatoberhaupt, jede Regierung,  welche diese Terroristen in Syrien unterstützt, sie trainiert, bewaffnet, ihnen NATO-Geheimdiensterkenntnisse zur Verfügung stellt, ihnen “Nicht-tödliche Hilfsmittel” liefert wie Merkel,  gehört vor ein internationales Kriegsverbrechertribunal und verurteilt. Sie alle gefährden den Völkerfrieden und verkörpern die terroristische Vereinigung NATO, sie gehören zu den Verbrecherstaaten  USrael, sie sind deren buckelnde Vasallen entgegen jeden Menschenrechts!

Und an die Medien, wieso mordet ihr erneut mit! An die Journallie welche Preise einheimst, schämt ihr euch nicht, ist es das Wert alle Menschlichkeit über Bord zu werfen und bedingungslos Verbrecher zu hoffieren?

Was sind das nur für Menschen.

Interessiert sich jemand für das Leben der  Geiseln in der Hand von den Menschenrechtsverbrechern von Daraa welche auch Köpfe kochen, CIA ausgerüstet und unterstützt?

 

 

Die heutigen Werte unserer Demokraten machen mir Angst.

http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/marcel-mettelsiefen-erhaelt-hanns-joachim-friedrich-preis-a-895165.html

 

…”Mettelsiefen: Ich habe Leichen mit gespaltenen Schädeln gesehen, ich habe erlebt, wie in einer Nacht 55 Kinder starben. Damit kann ich nur umgehen, indem ich produktiv bin und nicht nur über das Leid berichte, sondern auch von Hoffnung und Vergebung erzähle. “...

Herr Preisträger, wie wäre es mit der Wahrheit, einst eingebunden bei Mördern, wie wäre es wenn Sie sich für ihre Opfer interessieren! Vermutlich warten Angehörige auf Nachrichten was mit ihren Angehörigen passiert ist. Sie waren doch jede Sekunde und Minute dabei, eingebunden bei Mördern, den Farouck-Brigaden mit dem Menschenfresser.

 

Keine Vergebung ohne Wahrheiten.

 http://urs1798.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/deutscher-takfirist-aus-berlin-deso-dogg-in-bester-kopfabschneider-gesellschaft-die-westliche-wertegemeinschaft-in-syrien/

Die lächerlichste Deutsche Steuer finanzierte Insitution:

European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), als Ableger des CFR: Front Organisation im Drogen und Waffen Handel


Über den Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik ist ein direkter „Kaktusableger“ des CFR

Reine Verbrecher, Lügner und Terroristen sind heute die Deutschen Banden des Auswärtigen Amtes, wo Guido Westerwelle und Steinmeier nochmal mit der angeblichen Freien Syrischen Armee nachlegten, die real ausl. Söldner sind, vor allem aus Tschetschenien, Albanische Kopf Abschneider oft mit US Pass.

Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2015

Damaskus- Kopfabschneiderbanden Jaish al Islam, Rahman Corps, Ahrar al Sham und Jabhat al Nusra

Da westliche Presstituierte die Terroristen in Damaskus- Ghouta-Douma weiterhin als gemäßigte Rebellen an preisen, ein paar aktuelle Bilder der Kehlendurchschneider und Kopfabschneiderbanden rund um den saudisch-NATO-türkisch unterstützten Kriegsverbrecher Zahran Allousch, welcher nach wie vor mit Al-Kaida zusammen mordet.
Die gemäßigten Terroristen schneiden weiterhin Gefangenen die Kehlen durch und Köpfe ab, warum sollten sie sich auch geändert haben. Bisher haben die ganzen westlichen Presstituierten bei den Gräultaten weggesehen, sie tun es weiterhin.
Die Logos auf den Leichen-Fotos beinhalten die der Jabhat al Nusra und Jaish al Islam, beteiligt war auch das Al-Rahman Corps, die Ahrar al Sham,…, wie man an Hand diverser Videos sehen konnte.Umgebung Damaskus bei Marj al Sultan, in Ost-Ghouta

Das Logo der Jaish al Islam, Leichen ohne Köpfe. Auf dem Pickup auch eine helle Trage.
Abo Anas, ein Kumpel von dem Al-Kaida-Terroristenpropagandisten Hadi al Abdallah, welcher nichts gegen abgeschnittene Köpfe und durchschnittene Kehlen einzuwenden hat. Diese Gräultaten entsprechen den moralisch verkommenen „gemäßigten „Kehlendurchschneidern, des Westens liebste Rebellen…

Der hellbraune Stiefel blutbespritzt, vermutlich einer der Kehlendurchschneider. es gab ein Foto wo man den blutbespritzten Stiefel besser sehen konnte. Finde ich es wieder, wird es noch eingefügt
Offizieller Terroristen Twitterkanal der Jabhat al Nusra-Damaskus  https://twitter.com/JN__Dimashq

Leichname ohne Köpfe, ohne Logo, das Bild kommt aus der Richtung der Jaish al Islam, geführt von dem Fanatiker und abartigen Massenmörder Zahran Allousch.
In einem vorherigen Video zeigten die Al-Kaida-Partner der Jaish al Islam, dass sie Verwundete kaltblütigst abknallen.
Siehe auch hier:

 http://urs1798.blogspot.com/2015/12/blog-post.html

Hier ein zusammengeschnittenes Al-Kaida-Video von dem Oppositions Terroristensender Orient News TV. Die Terroristenplattform hat den hinteren Teil des original Al-Kaida-Videos weggeschnitten welches zeigte, wie die Terroristen wehrlose verwundete Soldaten kaltblütigst zusammenschießen. So arbeiten die gleichgeschalteten Terroristen-Unterstützer-Plattformen. Was nicht in die Propagandalinie passt, wie horrende Kriegsverbrechen, wird wegzensiert und unter den Teppich des Schweigens gekehrt.Genauso arbeitet unsere freiheitlich-demokratische Mainstream-Presse, auch die Terroristenunterstützer der zwangsfinanzierten öffentlichen Medienanstalten, führend dabei die Tagesschau, benutzen die selben Propagandamethoden, „Wahrheiten durch Weglassen des Wesentlichen“, eine einzige gezielte Manipulation, Methoden der Aufhetzung und bewusste Meinungsmache wie zu Hochzeiten der NS-Propaganda.

http://urs1798.blogspot.de/2015/12/damaskus-kopfabschneiderbanden-jaish-al.html

Stratfor: From Estonia to Azerbaijan: American Strategy After Ukraine

From Estonia to Azerbaijan: American Strategy After Ukraine

Tuesday, March 25, 2014 – 03:08 Print Text Size

Stratfor

By George Friedman

As I discussed last week, the fundamental problem that Ukraine poses for Russia, beyond a long-term geographical threat, is a crisis in internal legitimacy. Russian President Vladimir Putin has spent his time in power rebuilding the authority of the Russian state within Russia and the authority of Russia within the former Soviet Union. The events in Ukraine undermine the second strategy and potentially the first. If Putin cannot maintain at least Ukrainian neutrality, then the world’s perception of him as a master strategist is shattered, and the legitimacy and authority he has built for the Russian state is, at best, shaken.

Whatever the origins of the events in Ukraine, the United States is now engaged in a confrontation with Russia. The Russians believe that the United States was the prime mover behind regime change in Ukraine. At the very least, the Russians intend to reverse events in Ukraine. At most, the Russians have reached the conclusion that the United States intends to undermine Russia’s power. They will resist. The United States has the option of declining confrontation, engaging in meaningless sanctions against individuals and allowing events to take their course. Alternatively, the United States can choose to engage and confront the Russians.

A failure to engage at this point would cause countries around Russia’s periphery, from Estonia to Azerbaijan, to conclude that with the United States withdrawn and Europe fragmented, they must reach an accommodation with Russia. This will expand Russian power and open the door to Russian influence spreading on the European Peninsula itself. The United States has fought three wars (World War I, World War II and the Cold War) to prevent hegemonic domination of the region. Failure to engage would be a reversal of a century-old strategy.

The American dilemma is how to address the strategic context in a global setting in which it is less involved in the Middle East and is continuing to work toward a „pivot to Asia.“ Nor can the United States simply allow events to take their course. The United States needs a strategy that is economical and coherent militarily, politically and financially. It has two advantages. Some of the countries on Russia’s periphery do not want to be dominated by her. Russia, in spite of some strengths, is inherently weak and does not require U.S. exertion on the order of the two World Wars, the Cold War or even the Middle East engagements of the past decade.

The Russian and U.S. Positions

I discussed Russian options on Ukraine last week. Putin is now in a position where, in order to retain with confidence his domestic authority, he must act decisively to reverse the outcome. The problem is there is no single decisive action that would reverse events. Eventually, the inherent divisions in Ukraine might reverse events. However, a direct invasion of eastern Ukraine would simply solidify opposition to Russia in Kiev and trigger responses internationally that he cannot predict. In the end, it would simply drive home that although the Russians once held a dominant position in all of Ukraine, they now hold it in less than half. In the long run, this option — like other short-term options — would not solve the Russian conundrum.

Whatever Putin does in Ukraine, he has two choices. One is simply to accept the reversal, which I would argue that he cannot do. The second is to take action in places where he might achieve rapid diplomatic and political victories against the West — the Baltics, Moldova or the Caucasus — while encouraging Ukraine’s government to collapse into gridlock and developing bilateral relations along the Estonia-Azerbaijan line. This would prevent a U.S. strategy of containment — a strategy that worked during the Cold War and one that the Europeans are incapable of implementing on their own. This comes down to the Americans.

The United States has been developing, almost by default, a strategy not of disengagement but of indirect engagement. Between 1989 and 2008, the U.S. strategy has been the use of U.S. troops as the default for dealing with foreign issues. From Panama to Somalia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq, the United States followed a policy of direct and early involvement of U.S. military forces. However, this was not the U.S. strategy from 1914 to 1989. Then, the strategy was to provide political support to allies, followed by economic and military aid, followed by advisers and limited forces, and in some cases pre-positioned forces. The United States kept its main force in reserve for circumstances in which (as in 1917 and 1942 and, to a lesser degree, in Korea and Vietnam) allies could not contain the potential hegemon. Main force was the last resort.

This was primarily a strategy of maintaining the balance of power. The containment of the Soviet Union involved creating an alliance system comprising countries at risk of Soviet attack. Containment was a balance of power strategy that did not seek the capitulation of the Soviet Union as much as increasing the risks of offensive action using allied countries as the first barrier. The threat of full U.S. intervention, potentially including nuclear weapons, coupled with the alliance structure, constrained Soviet risk-taking.

Because the current Russian Federation is much weaker than the Soviet Union was at its height and because the general geographic principle in the region remains the same, a somewhat analogous balance of power strategy is likely to emerge after the events in Ukraine. Similar to the containment policy of 1945-1989, again in principle if not in detail, it would combine economy of force and finance and limit the development of Russia as a hegemonic power while exposing the United States to limited and controlled risk.

The coalescence of this strategy is a development I forecast in two books, The Next Decade and The Next 100 Years, as a concept I called the Intermarium. The Intermarium was a plan pursued after World War I by Polish leader Jozef Pilsudski for a federation, under Poland’s aegis, of Central and Eastern European countries. What is now emerging is not the Intermarium, but it is close. And it is now transforming from an abstract forecast to a concrete, if still emergent, reality.

Forces Leading to the Alliance’s Emergence

A direct military intervention by the United States in Ukraine is not possible. First, Ukraine is a large country, and the force required to protect it would outstrip U.S. capabilities. Second, supplying such a force would require a logistics system that does not exist and would take a long time to build. Finally, such an intervention would be inconceivable without a strong alliance system extending to the West and around the Black Sea. The United States can supply economic and political support, but Ukraine cannot counterbalance Russia and the United States cannot escalate to the point of using its own forces. Ukraine is a battleground on which Russian forces would have an advantage and a U.S. defeat would be possible.

If the United States chooses to confront Russia with a military component, it must be on a stable perimeter and on as broad a front as possible to extend Russian resources and decrease the probability of Russian attack at any one point out of fear of retaliation elsewhere. The ideal mechanism for such a strategy would be NATO, which contains almost all of the critical countries save Azerbaijan and Georgia. The problem is that NATO is not a functional alliance. It was designed to fight the Cold War on a line far to the west of the current line. More important, there was unity on the principle that the Soviet Union represented an existential threat to Western Europe.

That consensus is no longer there. Different countries have different perceptions of Russia and different concerns. For many, a replay of the Cold War, even in the face of Russian actions in Ukraine, is worse than accommodation. In addition, the end of the Cold War has led to a massive drawdown of forces in Europe. NATO simply lacks the force unless there is a massive and sudden buildup. That will not occur because of the financial crisis, among other reasons. NATO requires unanimity to act, and that unanimity is not there.

The countries that were at risk from 1945 to 1989 are not the same as those at risk today. Many of these countries were part of the Soviet Union then, and the rest were Soviet satellites. The old alliance system was not built for this confrontation. The Estonia-Azerbaijan line has as its primary interest retaining sovereignty in the face of Russian power. The rest of Europe is not in jeopardy, and these countries are not prepared to commit financial and military efforts to a problem they believe can be managed with little risk to them. Therefore, any American strategy must bypass NATO or at the very least create new structures to organize the region.

Characteristics of the Alliance

Each of the various countries involved is unique and has to be addressed that way. But these countries share the common danger that events in Ukraine could spread and directly affect their national security interests, including internal stability. As I observed, the Baltics, Moldova and the Caucasus are areas where the Russians could seek to compensate for their defeat. Because of this, and also because of their intrinsic importance, Poland, Romania and Azerbaijan must be the posts around which this alliance is built.

The Baltic salient, 145 kilometers (90 miles) from St. Petersburg in Estonia, would be a target for Russian destabilization. Poland borders the Baltics and is the leading figure in the Visegrad battlegroup, an organization within the European Union. Poland is eager for a closer military relationship with the United States, as its national strategy has long been based on third-power guarantees against aggressors. The Poles cannot defend themselves and the Baltics, given the combat capabilities necessary for the task.

The Dniester River is 80 kilometers from Odessa, the main port on the Black Sea for Ukraine and an important one for Russia. The Prut River is about 200 kilometers from Bucharest, the capital of Romania. Moldova is between these two rivers. It is a battleground region, at least of competing political factions. Romania must be armed and supported in protecting Moldova and in organizing southeastern Europe. In Western hands, Moldova threatens Odessa, Ukraine’s major port also used by Russia on the Black Sea. In Russian hands, Moldova threatens Bucharest.

At the far end of the alliance structure I am envisioning is Azerbaijan, on the Caspian Sea bordering Russia and Iran. Should Dagestan and Chechnya destabilize, Azerbaijan — which is Islamic and majority Shiite but secular — would become critical for limiting the regional spread of jihadists. Azerbaijan also would support the alliance’s position in the Black Sea by supporting Georgia and would serve as a bridge for relations (and energy) should Western relations with Iran continue to improve. To the southwest, the very pro-Russian Armenia — which has a Russian troop presence and a long-term treaty with Moscow — could escalate tensions with Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh. Previously, this was not a pressing issue for the United States. Now it is. The security of Georgia and its ports on the Black Sea requires Azerbaijan’s inclusion in the alliance.

Azerbaijan serves a more strategic purpose. Most of the countries in the alliance are heavy importers of Russian energy; for instance, 91 percent of Poland’s energy imports and 86 percent of Hungary’s come from Russia. There is no short-term solution to this problem, but Russia needs the revenue from these exports as much as these countries need the energy. Developing European shale and importing U.S. energy is a long-term solution. A medium-term solution, depending on pipeline developments that Russia has tended to block in the past, is sending natural gas from Azerbaijan to Europe. Until now, this has been a commercial issue, but it has become a strategically critical issue. The Caspian region, of which Azerbaijan is the lynchpin, is the only major alternative to Russia for energy. Therefore, rapid expansion of pipelines to the heart of Europe is as essential as providing Azerbaijan with the military capability to defend itself (a capability it is prepared to pay for and, unlike other allied countries, does not need to be underwritten).

The key to the pipeline will be Turkey’s willingness to permit transit. I have not included Turkey as a member of this alliance. Its internal politics, complex relations and heavy energy dependence on Russia make such participation difficult. I view Turkey in this alliance structure as France in the Cold War. It was aligned yet independent, militarily self-sufficient yet dependent on the effective functioning of others. Turkey, inside or outside of the formal structure, will play this role because the future of the Black Sea, the Caucasus and southeastern Europe is essential to Ankara.

These countries, diverse as they are, share a desire not to be dominated by the Russians. That commonality is a basis for forging them into a functional military alliance. This is not an offensive force but a force designed to deter Russian expansion. All of these countries need modern military equipment, particularly air defense, anti-tank and mobile infantry. In each case, the willingness of the United States to supply these weapons, for cash or credit as the situation requires, will strengthen pro-U.S. political forces in each country and create a wall behind which Western investment can take place. And it is an organization that others can join, which unlike NATO does not allow each member the right to veto.

The Practicality of the U.S. Strategy

There are those who would criticize this alliance for including members who do not share all the democratic values of the U.S. State Department. This may be true. It is also true that during the Cold War the United States was allied with the Shah’s Iran, Turkey and Greece under dictatorship and Mao’s China after 1971. Having encouraged Ukrainian independence, the United States — in trying to protect that independence and the independence of other countries in the region — is creating an alliance structure that will include countries, such as Azerbaijan, that have been criticized. However, if energy does not come from Azerbaijan, it will come from Russia, and then the Ukrainian events will dissolve into tragic farce. The State Department must grapple with the harsh forces its own policies have unleashed. This suggests that the high-mindedness borne of benign assumptions now proven to be illusions must make way for realpolitik calculations.

The balance of power strategy allows the United States to use the natural inclination of allies to bolster its own position and take various steps, of which military intervention is the last, not the first. It recognizes that the United States, as nearly 25 percent of the world’s economy and the global maritime hegemon, cannot evade involvement. Its very size and existence involves it. Nor can the United States confine itself to gestures like sanctions on 20 people. This is not seen as a sign of resolve as much as weakness. It does mean that as the United States engages in issues like Ukraine and must make strategic decisions, there are alternatives to intervention — such as alliances. In this case, a natural alliance structure presents itself — a descendant of NATO but shaped for this crisis, much like the alliance I forecast previously.

In my view, Russian power is limited and has flourished while the United States was distracted by its wars in the Middle East and while Europe struggled with its economic crisis. That does not mean Russia is not dangerous. It has short-term advantages, and its insecurity means that it will take risks. Weak and insecure states with temporary advantages are dangerous. The United States has an interest in acting early because early action is cheaper than acting in the last extremity. This is a case of anti-air missiles, attack helicopters, communications systems and training, among other things. These are things the United States has in abundance. It is not a case of deploying divisions, of which it has few. The Poles, Romanians, Azerbaijanis and certainly the Turks can defend themselves. They need weapons and training, and that will keep Russia contained within its cauldron as it plays out a last hand as a great power.

Editor’s Note: We invite subscribers to access the full text of the chapters that focused on Russia’s unsustainable revival in international affairs from George Friedman’s 2011 book, The Next Decade, and his 2009 book, The Next 100 Years, by clicking the links below. Excerpts reprinted with permission from Doubleday, a division of Penguin Random House, Inc.

The Next Decade
Chapter 8: The Return of Russia

Read more: From Estonia to Azerbaijan: American Strategy After Ukraine | Stratfor
Follow us: @stratfor on Twitter | Stratfor on Facebook

 

2014-0698.zip         WL-Stratfor 99 Emails on Anonymous and Zetas     May 2, 2014

The criminal record of Ilir Meta in Albania – Three government officials have resigned or been sacked

25 Mar 14
Crime Revelations Force Albanian Officials to Quit

Three government officials have resigned or been sacked over the last two weeks after the opposition spotlighted their criminal records.

Besar Likmeta
BIRN

Tirana

Fisnik Myrtezaj
Fisnik Myrtezaj,a drug Boss was the new security Chief of the Port of Durres and partner of the Ilir Meta-Nard (Lefter Koka) drug kartell with the family Spartak Braho.

Klientel Politik der Mafia Partei LSI des Ilir Meta und Spartak Braho: Nichts Neues, denn ein Ilir Meta, besorgte schon der Spartak Braho Bande, Diplomaten Pässe, bis man diese Leute in Italien 2001 festnahm.

The logistics director in the port of Durres, Fisnik Myrtezaj, a recent appointment by the centre-left government of Edi Rama, resigned on Monday following accusations that he had a criminal record for drug trafficking.

On Sunday, the opposition Democratic Party said Myrtezaj had been jailed in 2011 for three and half years for the crime.

“[Prime Minister] Edi Rama has entrusted the services in the port of Durres to a person who in 2011 was sentenced for cocaine trafficking,” the Democratic Party spokesperson, Laura Vorspi, said.

According to the media, Myrtezaj wrote in his resignation letter that „the accusations against him were politically motivated”. The court decision from 26.11.2011

His resignation follows the dismissal of two other officials over the last two weeks, following revelations that they had criminal records.

Last week, Prime Minister Rama was forced to sack the food safety chief, Aleksander Kalemaj, after it emerged that in 2012 he had been arrested for selling home-made alcohol.

The head of the employment office in the town of Kavaja also resigned after the opposition revealed the he was the target of an arrest warrant, for trafficking in contraband cigarettes.

 http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/albania-govt-appointments-raise-eyebrows

11/1/2010
Ex-Staats SekretÄr des Ilir Meta’s: Almir Rrapo, Albaniens grosser Verbrecher Clans, wird in die USA ausgeliefert

 

Gani Dizdari
Gani Dizdari: Mafia judge of Albania and judge in case of Fisnik Myrtezaj

3/24/2014

Der Chef der Durres Hafen Sicherheit: Fisnik Myrtezaj, ist ein verurteilter Kokain Drogen Boss, Grundstücks Dokumenten, Fälschungen, Raub,

Er bestreitet natürlich Alles und hier ist das Gerichts Urteil (von einem prominenten korrupten Richter: Gani Dizdari sogar), auch wegen Zigaretten Schmuggel verurteilt. als ein Gross Schmuggler aus der Politik Finanzierung. Erneut Original Bujar Nishani Richter im Sumpf der von der EU installierten Mafia Justiz in Albanien.

Das Urteil! vom 26.11.2011

Mafia Clan of Democratic Party of Albania

Prime Minister Sali Berisha
  1. kukRexhep ARAPI, resident in Katund Sukth, nicknamed “KEPI” has a criminal record as follows:
  1. In the year 1991 (in March) he has killed at the Port of Durrës, for feud issues the citizen A. Cyrbja, resident in the Katund Sukth village; has been arrested for this crime in 1994 and has been released because of lack of evidence.

………

Gjoka Super Market-Shiak! 15 years drug and prostitutions center! Abhol Center für Drogen, über 15 Jahre, auch für Kosovaren, welche auf die Fähren wollen.Die Xhafzotaj – Shiak Mafia: AGIM HOXHA und die Terroristen Familie: BLEDI MUSA SHUAIPI in Durres

  1. Dashamir GJOKA and his clan, residing in the Sallmone village have a criminal record as follows:
  2. D. Gjoka has been and is one of the biggest traffickers of women with intent of prostitution to Italy. The chief of the girls in Italy has been a girl from Vlora, named Linda, who is currently Dashi’s wife and they have two children. Her brother Miri works at the Supermarket as chief accountant. D. Gjoka is on record in the State Police for International Drugs Trafficking and Women with intent for prostitution, Murder etc.
    The Gjoka Supermarket is the main center for the trafficking of drugs that comes from Turkey and Macedonia and the supply base for many criminal groups in Durres and Tirana and also the location where the cars that will be traveling to Italy and carrying drugs are supplied. Dashi currently owns an armored vehicle which has the licence plate: DR 51 90 C. It must be noted that Dash Gjoka is the main source of supply for all the drugs suppliers in Albania because it is a well known fact that a close friend and financial supporter of I.M, S. Olldashi. The latter meets with Gjoka almost every week. Oftentimes, the Democratic Party MPs Bamir Topi, Ridvan Bode, S. Olldashi etc come to dine or to supply in this supermarket, since they are close friends with Dashi.
  3. ………………
  4. http://www.albca.com/aclis/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1264